On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 20:37 -0400, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
From: Johnny Hughes mailing-lists@hughesjr.com
BTW, I haven't looked yet, is Netscape Directory Server available for CentOS? You can get it from the RHN (as well as the "technology preview"), just wondering if it's available for CentOS from another source.
No, Not yet. They are changing / have changed the name to Red Hat Directory Services ... and when it is released for RHEL-4 it will be built for CentOS-4 as well.
OpenAFS: I'll have to look at the license that it is released under ... that might be able to be in Extras ... someone want to maintain it :)
IBM's IPL, yet another GPL-incompatible license along with IBM's CPL. People claim I have an "agenda" against IBM. No, but I _do_ have an "agenda" to get people to realize that they should hold IBM up against the same standard (and "agenda") they have against Sun.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
Nope ... I can't build that with GNU gcc and against GNU glibc and release it ... sorry, no OpenAFS :(
Now the last time I checked, Red Hat did include the OpenAFS client in the kernel -- at least GPL portions (the history of AFS is a little interest). The OpenAFS server is user-space, so there is not a licensing issue there.
I typically just download and build the full IPL licensed client/server from OpenAFS, despite the licensing issues. If it's for private use, you can do this per the GPL -- you just can't redistribute anything that isn't GPL compatible linked against GPL (which is what I make my clients aware of).
BTW. If people think "ignorance" is a "harsh word," understand when you are "ignorant" as a consulting engineer with a Professional Engineering license, the term becomes "Professsional Negligence" with the same, _liability_ as an MD. ;->
So I tend to avoid "ignorance" and care about little details. ;->
Correct ... Pine is non-free license, won't be built for CentOS-4 :)
But remember, it's Red Hat's fault. ;->