-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
|>>Since people have both updates and os in their yum.conf files, how are |>>they _NOT_ going to get the update. |> |>I didn't think 7.3 was accessible unless you enabled the testing |>repository. I'll verify and hit lance if that's NOT the case as it |>would invalidate what I've just said. |>
This was intended to imply via a yum command.
|> |>>It seems to me they will still get the newer version via yum and |>>dependency resolution regardless of where in the directory structure it |>>is. |> |>If 7.3 is infact in updates, they are getting it. |> | | No ... if it is in centos/3.4/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/ they are getting | it ...
this is such a mess....but for everyone who may have this question. caching-nameserver-7.2 and caching-name-server-7.3 both exist in the centos/3.4/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS (new installs and network installs will get 7.3 due to the package list). System doing upgrades will only see 7.2 because 7.2 is the only package populated in centos/3.4/os/i386/headers/ .
| yum.conf has an entry like this: | | [base] | name=CentOS-$releasever - Base | baseurl=mirror.../centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ | | SO ... any RPM in centos/3.4/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/ is going to also be in | package resolution...since 7.3 is in centos/3.4/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/ and | since 7.2 is in updates, 7.3 will be installed. |
See about regarding the location of both packages. Also yum only uses the headers it finds (as a result of using yum-arch). It doesn't NOT examine the actual files in the directory.
.dn