-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Harris Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 6:24 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] leap second
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:09:41AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'm sort of curious about how a bug of this magnitude slips through the QA process (into java and RHEL, not CentOS). With all the furor about y2k, did no one even bother to simulate a leap second ahead of the real occurrence?
The kernel bug is a race condition; simulations may not have detected it. -----Original Message-----
Very well, but this isn't the first leap second-insertion (2005, 2009), and certainly not the last. I never heard of such consequences before.
Hans
______________________________________________________________________ Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten.
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.