On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Brian Mathis wrote:
PLEASE STOP. WE DO NOT NEED THIS AGAIN, ESPECIALLY SO CLOSE TO RELEASE.
+10000000000000000000000000000
FWIW, traffic on the mirror list says C6 is being rsync'd to the external mirrors
as I type this.
Regards,
--
Tom Diehl tdiehl@rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd123@rogueind.com
>
>
> -☙ Brian Mathis ❧-
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Ron Blizzard
rb4centos@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Steven Crothers
>>
steven.crothers@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Thankfully some good things have come of this complete disaster that is
>>> CentOS 6.
>>> * Scientific Linux 6
>>> * Oracle Enterprise 6 (Which is free to download folks)
>>> * Clear-OS Core (Which is ran by a professional organization instead of a
>>> group if you're into that)
>>
>> Uh... Scientific Linux didn't "come from" CentOS. It's been in
>> existence since 2004. Oracle Linux? Go for it, if supporting a
>> parasitical, ungrateful corporation is your thing and if you like to
>> pay for updates to them (I would just use Red Hat, if it were me).
>> Clear-OS Core? Strange, I don't see its 6.0 version available for
>> download yet. They've got an alpha out there, but it remains to be
>> seen how will they'll rebuild Red Hat and how long their rebuilding
>> project will last. I'm guessing they'll find it's a lot of work, go
>> back to using CentOS and put their time back into their main product
>> line. But we'll see.
>>
>> --
>> RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>>
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
>
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>