Re: [CentOS] DNS wizard

On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 15:18, Sam Drinkard wrote:

I'm no bind guru by any sort of means, and I know there were significant changes between bind 8 and bind 9. I was more curious why it was considered lame server whereas prior to CentOS, it worked well, and was not considered lame under BSD. Everything still works, but there are some warnings if you look at the report from http://dnsreport.com plugging in my domain name. Part of that problem is upstream, which I can get corrected *I think* :-)

A 'lame server' means you are delegating (vs NS records) to servers that don't respond for the zone you've specified. NS records in the wrong form would give that effect.