Les wrote:
Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions when publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just how bad things were and how much we gained from that process). But wasn't closing the process and letting 'experts' do that before shipping supposed to have improved things?
not really sure what you are saying Les...
what are you saying?
are you talking about Red Hat internal processes ?
it is a very profitable publically traded corporate structure with employees and products...
what dont you understand about that?
- rh