Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:12 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
No, you should pay us, says Larry, I need to keep my yacht and fighter jet taken care of....
Once again, the problem seems to be hatred of Ellison more than anything else.
Have you seen any of my other posts, where I describe Sun/Oracle's utterly abysmal and unacceptable support? Perhaps you might, and then you might understand why I, personally, dislike Oracle. They've also always been the high-priced spread. I've never been involved with the contracts, so I simply don't know: perhaps someone here can tell us the difference between the costs of the 3? 4? SLA contracts from RH and Oracle? I'll wager Oracle's is comparable or higher.
Red Hat and CentOS based on it are #1, it´s only natural that smaller players want a piece of the pie.
In the US: at least five years ago, SuSE was the bigger share in Europe.
This is different from Novell trying to lure RHEL users exactly how? http://news.techworld.com/operating-systems/106971/novell-looks-to-lure-red-...
RH, not free distros. <snip>
Just one last question: if you think this highly of OUL, why are you here? Why haven't you gone to their lists?
mark "not imputing someone being a marketing troll"