On 02/09/2017 12:53 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/09/2017 12:50 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello John,
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 16:33 +0000, John Hodrien wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
How about my request for checksums in the git repo?
What checksums would you actually want in git?
SRPMS are signed which allows the integrity of the contents to be checked. Such an integrity check is missing from the git repo.
Either a checksum file for each file or a single checksums file per package/release holding all checksums for all files of said package/release (including the tarballs that are downloaded with get_sources.sh).
Regards, Leonard.
Red Hat exports the source code to the repo, I don't think they are going to change what the put in. It is an extracted SRPM.
At the time of extraction, the <name>.metadata file is created (again, not by us, but by the Red Hat team that distributes source), and all the non-text sha1sums are in there as well as all the text sources.
You can see who modifies any of those files (the text sources and the text <name>.metadata file).