12 Dec
2009
12 Dec
'09
8:09 p.m.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl maillists@conactive.com wrote:
Mhr wrote on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:50:27 -0800:
Yes, using ZA is a bad idea. XP has its own firewall which is enabled by default if you are patched up-to-date. Keep that on.
Now you've sparked my curiosity - how is the XP firewall any better than ZA?
Also, in regard to other answers I've seen on the list, since I'm using NAT, isn't another firewall just a waste?
Thanks.
mhr