6 Mar
2013
6 Mar
'13
9:59 p.m.
On 03/06/2013 12:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
OK, but in my opinion it is worse if that was a design decision that is just now being changed. Bugs I can understand, but not choosing to design a new filesystem with unrealistic limitations.
It's not being changed, per se. A reasonable means of increasing the number of back-references has been implemented. (again, AFAICT)