14 Jul
2012
14 Jul
'12
7 p.m.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Michael Lampe lampe@gcsc.uni-frankfurt.de wrote:
Namely:
- hivex
- hivex-devel
- librdmac
- librdmac-devel
- sanlock-libs
- sanlock-devel
and maybe others.
Is this on purpose (I don't know if upstream has removed or updated the 32-bit rpms, but the old ones are still in C6.3/x86_64), or is it just the usual sloppyness (I've been told here on previous occasions the biarch is a pain in the ass to maintain, nobody cares anyway, it's not 'plain', and no sensible man should be using it).
FYI:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5836
Akemi