On Wednesday, March 17, 2010 09:41 PM, JohnS wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 21:10 +0800, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
JohnS wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 23:19 -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Mysql by itself has built in "clustering" though there can be significant limitations in it depending on your requirements.
I agree. The built in cluster has too many limitations to be useful, but MySQL master-master replication gives a very good alternative to a true cluster. We use it to deploy geographically redundant systems and it has worked very well for us.
Neil
Well what are your plans when it gets the AXE??
firebirdsql of course.
You have a loving for Pontiacs?
Trans AM.
But don't let that get in the way of replacing MySQL with firebirdsql. ;-)
After they have suffered enough, then they eat crow and finally go postgresql. :-D