On May 26, 2011, at 3:49 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 5/26/11, John Hodrien J.H.Hodrien@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
Spinning disks seem an awful lot like victorian technology taken too far. In the long term, what's *not* to like about the idea of fully solid state storage?
Personally, I'm averse to using SSD with any important long term data is the nightmare that I could one day wake up to find everything gone without any means of recovery. Compared that to a hard disk, which barring catastrophic physical damage, I could pay somebody to just read the data off the platter.
As a performance boosting intermediary storage, yes, long term... maybe not quite yet
multiple layers of backup. My main system has a main system. With scheduled backups to an external hard drive, and online. I have a lot of data on it like pictures that I wouldn't want to lose. A SSD would replace my main boot drive, with faster access to data as used. But the external drive would still be there for backup.