On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Holway andrew.holway@gmail.com wrote:
In the context of this discussion I would appreciate any feedback the list might have on this article I wrote for my new company.
Well put. For a non-technical person, your brief clues them in to the differences between RHEL and CentOS. And the reason both coexist.
I do however agree with Valeri in that you probably (c|s)hould mention Debian in there somewhere. I realize you left Debian out because there is no official "enterprise" support entity as there is with Ubuntu. So at that point, maybe it's not worth mentioning Debian?
I for one welcome our Redhat overlords. I think they will provide better governance which should give Centos better credibility as an Enterprise, community supported operating system.
On 4 April 2015 at 17:17, Lamar Owen lowen@pari.edu wrote:
On 04/04/2015 06:12 AM, Nux! wrote:
100% with Digimer here.
I think there are no conspiracy theories. IMO RedHat does not want nor does it afford to mess up CentOS.
All this energy should be put into contributing towards to the project, testing, helping out community.
Lucian
Agreed, and I want to thank you specifically for the nux dextop repo,
which is in my standard installed repo set for EL6 and EL7.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos