On 09/24/2013 03:55 PM, Lists wrote:
On 09/19/2013 08:26 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
It works for what it does. And I'm completely prepared to freeze it as far as software goes. I was just curious what may have happened after that particular version of the kernel, and whether there's something else I can do, or call it done, slap a red sticker on it that read, "DON'T EVER UPGRADE ANYMORE" and call it done.
For what it's worth, we have a single-core P3 running the latest Centos6/32 without issue. I realize that from a processing power stand point my SIP phone is probably faster, but like Ashley, it does a job and very well at that. (network monitor)
[root@edison ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 7 model name : Pentium III (Katmai) stepping : 3 cpu MHz : 498.456 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 mmx fxsr sse up bogomips : 996.91 clflush size : 32 cache_alignment : 32 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 32 bits virtual power management:
[root@edison ~]# cat /proc/version Linux version 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.i686 (mockbuild@c6b10.bsys.dev.centos.org) (gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Aug 28 14:27:42 UTC 2013
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
What is with people these days? Why if something works but it is old do people want to say OMG you need new hardware?