On 04.Dez.2013, at 15:57, Markus Falb wrote:
On 04.Dez.2013, at 15:11, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Markus Falb wrote:
... # pvdisplay Found duplicate PV b79x0kLXR9mAC0z0IZUxyJG1VC24Crl7: using /dev/sda2 not /dev/md1 --- Physical volume --- PV Name /dev/sda2 VG Name vg_sys PV Size 1.36 TB / not usable 6.81 MB
<snip> smartctl -t short to start. And is there anything in your logfiles saying something like " Device: /dev/sdb [SAT], 98 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors"?
Interesting, I have this in /etc/smartd.conf DEVICESCAN -n standby -a -m root -s (L/../../6/00|S/../.././00)
but according to the selftest logs it seems it is only checking sdb but *not* sda. I'll have to check this out. A manual short test succeeded. However, a failing disk should not affect LVM, should it?
oh,
... # pvs /dev/sda2 Found duplicate PV b79x0kLXR9mAC0z0IZUxyJG1VC24Crl7: using /dev/md1 not /dev/sda2 PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/md1 vg_sys lvm2 a-- 1.36T 553.16G
# pvs /dev/sdb2 Failed to read physical volume "/dev/sdb2" ...
smart status tells me
... 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 001 001 036 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 4095 ...
smartd did not send warning mail, selftests are successful, only in the logfiles is
... Device: /dev/sdb [SAT], FAILED SMART self-check. BACK UP DATA NOW! Device: /dev/sdb [SAT], Failed SMART usage Attribute: 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct. ...
I think I will replace sdb.
-- Thank You, Markus