3 Jun
2009
3 Jun
'09
11:14 a.m.
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:17:35 +0200:
One of the reasons CentOS chose not to do it
It appears that only a very very small number of people need it or *think* they need it.
Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice than CentOS 5.3, as it seems to be not really clear to people that this is not a "new version", but an update to the 5 series.
Cheers,
Ralph