2 Jun
2012
2 Jun
'12
4:59 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:46 PM, John R. Dennison jrd@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 03:36:09PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
maybe in 2003, when Linux NFS was sketchy, this made sense.
Unlikely back then, either. It's a userland implementation, subject to all the same scheduling issues as any other userland app; filesystems should not be implemented in userland for efficiency reasons.
John
John,
A process implemented in the userland may not be as efficient as one implemented as part of the kernel - but that doesn't mean it can't scale well, does it?
Boris.