14 Nov
2015
14 Nov
'15
6:06 p.m.
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Ulf Volmer wrote:
On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
When I enable stp:
[root@localhost ~]# brctl show br0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3 enp0s8
As Gordon said, i recommend to remove one of the physical interfaces from the bridge.
There should be no need to do that ... that is after all the purpose of STP (in effect, what STP would do is prevent one link from being used by putting it into blocking state leaving the other in forwarding state). Nominally one would prefer bonding (AKA trunking or a LAG) where both can be actively used.
/mark