----- "Scott Silva" ssilva@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 1-7-2009 10:00 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following:
Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 +0000 (GMT):
Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions unless one could be an update/bugfix?
So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there
is a
problem on his setup with it?
Kai
Yes, but yum needs a little coercion to ignore that update. You would have to exclude that package after you got the older one installed so it didn't update.
The repo owner's latest packages technically 'work' but not to our standards hence the reason we're staying behind for now. We're not running any sort of automated 'yum -y update' or anything like that so I don't have to worry about updates causing issues. After all, I'm the only one who has access to the box. :-)
Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105