Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 21/06/09 13:28, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
That page does indeed reflect the current state of play - there is *no* centos approved or recommended commercial support entity - but it *is* something that is being worked on.
i realize that page is *technically* correct, but its wording is quite discouraging:
If you want to propose a blob of text that might replace whats on the page right now, I am sure we can plumb that in.
i'm not the right person for that as i am utterly clueless about what possibilities you're exploring at the moment. that has to be done by someone at centos who's involved in it.
rday
======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
if you are going to be the consultant and you are recommending Centos then you are definitely a good person to make a suggestion as to what should go in there. Take a whack at it.