Dear All,
I'm having trouble on 2 laptops Lenovo B580 since upgrading to Centos6.5. ( Because it's a Lenovo I cannot switch the network card for a better supported network card. )
There on the latest kernel :
root@jac network-scripts]# uname -a Linux jac.cawdekempen 2.6.32-431.1.2.0.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 13 13:06:13 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
With the help of the Elrepo Broadcom page I got the driver and that part works fine. The network card works :
# vi /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules # PCI device 0x14e4:0x4727 (wl) SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="c0:14:3d:c1:f6:ef", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1"
# uname -a eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C0:14:3D:C1:F6:EF inet6 addr: fe80::c214:3dff:fec1:f6ef/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:651 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:17
But I cannot connect to any wireless network with neither of the machines.
I click on the gnome-nm-applet and type in the password.
[root@jac network-scripts]# tail -f /var/log/messages Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: added 'scan_ssid' value '1' Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: added 'key_mgmt' value 'WPA-PSK' Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: added 'psk' value '<omitted>' Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: added 'group' value 'TKIP CCMP' Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Activation (eth1) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete. Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Config: set interface ap_scan to 1 Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: inactive -> scanning Dec 19 11:10:18 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: scanning -> associating Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: associating -> disconnected Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: disconnected -> scanning Dec 19 11:10:29 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: scanning -> associating Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: associating -> disconnected Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: disconnected -> scanning Dec 19 11:10:40 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: scanning -> associating Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Activation (eth1/wireless): association took too long. Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): device state change: 5 -> 6 (reason 0) Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Activation (eth1/wireless): asking for new secrets Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Couldn't disconnect supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface "fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012. Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Couldn't disconnect supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface "fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012. Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): supplicant connection state: associating -> disconnected Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): device state change: 6 -> 9 (reason 7) Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Activation (eth1) failed for access point (Clive) Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> Marking connection 'Auto Clive' invalid. Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <warn> Activation (eth1) failed. Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): device state change: 9 -> 3 (reason 0) Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: <info> (eth1): deactivating device (reason: 0).
googling for "centos6 WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012" I found this bug:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5834
could this be the same issue?
Greetings, J.