25 Mar
2006
25 Mar
'06
9:48 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 08:37:53PM -0600, Jason Ish wrote:
libpcap-0.8.4 but I don't want it to replace the 0.8.3 package, so I've modified the package name to be like <something>.libpcap-0.8.3...
I know this may same weird, but is prefixing the package name a sane approach to this?
You can compare that with the compat- packages. So yes, I would think that is the recomended way to do it.
- -- Rodrigo Barbosa rodrigob@suespammers.org "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEJjkupdyWzQ5b5ckRAl9qAJ0R7D/LBUNXsT5t7iBFOPy4zWwmfwCgkzkm
caTvCN3maS42f70mHZHfHYk=
=BfND
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----