On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 08:08 -0700, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
Karanbir Singh Mail-Lists@karan.org wrote:
I agree with OT, your post had little use for someone who uses CentOS.
I disagree, for the reasons Bryan gives here:
I was trying to find out how to best spit out what i386 RPMs I had loaded on x86-64 and is VERY APPLICABLE TO THOSE OF US RUNNING DESKTOPS/WORKSTATIONS WHERE WE NEED I386 BINARY COMPATIBILITY!!!
Maybe some of you have not yet experienced the x86-64 port, but x86-64 binaries canNOT call i386 libraries/plug-ins and vice-versa.
This is very much on-topic for this list. In fact, it's the main reason I read it.
At this point, I am going to *** HORDE MY KNOWLEDGE *** because I'm sick and tired of the IGNORANCE OF SOME PEOPLE who think something is off-topic when it's *CORE* to RHEL/CENTOS.
Please don't; just ignore the nitwits who don't realize that not everyone is stuck using i386. ;-)
And thanks for posting that list of "off-road" rpms needed for decent browsing on x86_64.