On 4/15/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">John Summerfield</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:debian@herakles.homelinux.org">debian@herakles.homelinux.org</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Probably, you should be on lkml - the Linux kernel mailing list.</blockquote><div><br>I used to be, but that was ages ago.&nbsp; Guess I&#39;ll be rejoining when I find it.... <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
There is no need, or even point, to create rpms for each dumb mistake.</blockquote><div><br>Oh, I don&#39;t know - I could screw up more people who were dumb enough to take my rpms....<br><br>:-)<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
If at all possible, you should be testing first in uml, xen or other<br>virtual environment.</blockquote><div><br>I have a&nbsp; dedicated test machine here at work.&nbsp; It builds nicely and so far I haven&#39;t built a kernel that won&#39;t boot, AND I have fallbacks for if I do....
<br><br>Thanks.<br><br>mhr<br></div></div><br>