Great idea, But to take it one step further, think I'll use 10, 20, 30, ...
That way I'll have room to insert new levels where ever I need them.
On 7/26/07, drew einhorn < drew.einhorn@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions,
> and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing
> things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not
> exist, some exist but are empty, etc.
If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the
highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base
etc.
Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos