On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:18:29 -0400, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/22/07, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith paulg@cse.yorku.ca wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:25:07 -0400, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith paulg@cse.yorku.ca wrote:
I didn't see anything that would indicate it (the patch) would work
with
kernel 2.6.9. I was hoping I didn't have to split up my kernel
versions,
for example a supported CentOS kernel for servers and a unsupported
kernel
for the clients that have the lastest and greatest hardware. I was
going
to give 2.6.9 a quick try and if that didn't work, then go to 2.6.18
which
is the base for CentOS 5.
I took a quick look at the 2.6.9 source code. That patch would not work for this kernel.
I also checked the Centos 5 kernel (2.6.18-8.x). The patch you referred to will not work there either. However, I saw a test kernel available from upstream that already has that fix applied. So, there is some good chance that CentOS 5.1 will have it. Given the fact you need it by early September, this may not work out either.
Akemi
Thank You for the help!!
In the meantime we will get a SATA DVD drive to test with CentOS 4.5. If anything changes I will post under this thread.
Thanks Again, Paul