-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2012 03:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwalsh@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh
dwalsh@redhat.com wrote:
Now if only more people used RHEL we could further enhance the products. :^)
Why isn't it accepted as more of a standard?
I don't understand the question.
Why is it vendor-specific to RHEL?
I was talking Money not vendor specific. The question meant as a jab was if more people used RHEL instead of Centos, we could pay more developers. I thought the @redhat.com would signify why I would want that. :^)
OK, I can understand why you would want that. I don't understand why you think anyone else would want even more nonstandard variations in linux distributions. And if this isn't intended to be vendor-specific, why isn't it an independent upstream project or included in the kernel?
--- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com
Again, there is nothing that we do that is Vendor specific, Everything we do with SELinux is open source. We are working to get our stuff upstream.
I have no idea what you are talking about as far as variations in Linux Distributions. I work regularly with people in Centos, RHEL, gentoo, ubunto, debian, fedora and today even Mandriva. SELinux was just released for android also. As I tweeted yesterday.
https://twitter.com/#!/rhatdan http://selinuxproject.org/page/SEAndroid