On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:53 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Wes James wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:38 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
<snip>
mark "NOT a fan of selinux, dealt with it far too much"OK. Why not use some other linux that doesn't use selinux then? I guess in permissive mode, you could still monitor the logs and take action, if needed.
- The most widely used distro of Linux in the US is RHEL ("upstream") and
RHEL-derived distros, like CentOS. RHEL gives you selinux. 2. You really expect any organization, much less a large one, to change distros just because there's issues that annoy sysadmins, and only occasionally users (due to sysadmins fighting the good fight, and mostly beating the damn thing)? 3. I really, *REALLY* like a *stable* distro (don't get me started on fedora). None of us wants to debug the o/s....
Yeah, I'm the one who does most of the shut selinux up around here....
mark
Ok. Thanks for the info.
-wes