-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 26/08/15 20:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote:
----- Original Message ----- | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- | Hash: SHA1 | | On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote: | > On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote: | >> julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com | > | >> Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content | >> that is not suitable for minors. | > | >> It is possible subscribed under different address. | > | >> IP of offending spam : | > | >> Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com | >> [45.55.128.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher
As you see from this your header spam was not delivered through centos mail list, but comes from one of the IPs of digitalocean.com IP block: 45.55.0.0/16. As Fabian told centos mail list server admins contacted digitalocean.com about abuse (even though indirect, but with apparent misuse of centos list servers for collecting e-mails of posters). And the moment I received my copy of this spam _after_ Fabian mentioned they contacted digitalocean.com, I just blocked mail from their block of IP addresses (45.55.0.0/16) on my servers as digitalocean apparently didn't react to abuse notice promptly. Others may want to do the same, thus we will pass the message with all seriousness to digitalocean.com.
Just my $0.02
Valeri
Still no news from DigitalOcean since multiple people complained to them about that issue. There are also some other IPs used to send those mails, and from CIDR: 104.236.0.0/16 too.
I can try to ask again the status about those IPs, but I also guess that the more people complain about it, the more they'll look at it. If you still receive such mail (I personally never had *any* of those offending/spam mails myself), feel free to report that to https://www.digitalocean.com/company/contact/#tab_abusetrigger
Kind Regards,
- -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab