Robert Hanson roberth@abbacomm.net wrote:
what does your resolv.conf file look like? what does your named.conf file look like?
From what I saw in this thread, the original poster is (was?)
interested in caching for local Windows systems. That's why "nscd" came up but was quickly dismissed.
maybe the thread name should be changed if you are using bind or bind caching nameserver
That's why I append the subject to nscd, but now I've responded and changed it again here. We started to go off on "nscd," but then we came back to the BIND or another DNS caching/fowarding server**.
-- Bryan
**[OT]NOTE: My primary reason for doing this is that it makes it easier to find discussions in the archives, while still reserving the "sort by subject" in the mail readers too. It's the same logic that was used prior for UseNet per the (now lost?) O'Reilly discussion guidelines. It not only helps raise my ratings in Google searches, as well as popularity in people who click on them, but I get thanks from people who see my subject appendings mid-thread out of dozens or even hundreds of items (saving them a lot of effort).
Thread ID in SMTP/NNTP always maintains threading proper (which is why I switched to Yahoo for webmail recently, away from not only my old provider who didn't, but GMail which has stated it will never).