Care to explain those two. direct versus indirect mapping?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner ashley@pcraft.com wrote:
Nope, that completely takes over '/mnt' and everything else that's in
there
becomes invisible. However, I do believe you're on to something here. Looking back at the other, working setup, I do realize now that I did the same, where the path was '/mnt/<something>' and the autofs mounts are within that, so they became '/mnt/<something>/<mount-point>' - so thanks for that hint. I'll go fiddle with it.
Right, I use something other than /mnt for my autofs.
Another thing you may want to consider is use of 'direct map' instead of 'indirect map'. If I remember correctly, it works well with cifs mounts, too.
Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos