Server utilization and seperation. I need 10 web servers, none of which are going to be busy, but each organization in my business wants their "own".
10 vms on a 2 cpu box makes more sense that 1 web server on each of ten. Add a second vm host for some redundancy, etc, etc.
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Digimer wrote:
On 05/27/2011 02:33 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have been working off and on with Xen and KVM on a couple of test hosts for that past year or so and while now everything seems to function as expected, more or less, I find myself asking the question: Why?
We run our own servers at our own sites for our own purposes. We do not, with a few small exceptions, host alien domains. So, while rapidly provisioning or dynamically expanding a client's vm might be very attractive to a public hosting provider that is not our business model at all.
Why would a small company not in the public hosting business choose to employ VM technology? What are the benefits over operating several individual small form factor servers or blades instead? I am curious because what I can find on the net respecting VM use cases, outside of for public providers or application testing, seems to me mostly puff and smoke.
This might be considered OT but since CentOS is what we use it seems to me best that I ask here to start.
Live migration between physical hosts. Also, ease of recovery in the event of a failure. Can move the VM to entirely new hardware when the old hardware is no longer powerful enough... etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE jim@rossberry.com http://www.rossberry.net "Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." Thomas Paine