Curt Mills <hacker@fluke.com> · 11/02/2009 01:11 PM

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Bowie Bailey wrote:

> mark wrote:

>> *I* would *never* put something that was under 1.0 (actually,
1.0.1) into

>> production.

>

> Keep in mind that version numbers are often fairly arbitrary (esp.
on

> open source projects).

True.  Anyone remember this one?  0.99pl92

That's a linux kernel from the time when Linus just would _not_ bump

it up to v1.0 and move on.  He stayed with 0.99 versions for a

lonnnnnnng time.

-- 

Curt Mills, WE7U                
            hacker at fluke dot com

Senior Methods Engineer/SysAdmin

   "Lotto:  A tax on people who are bad at math."  
  -- unknown

"Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." --
WE7U

"The world DOES revolve around me:  I picked the coordinate system!"

Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information.

 If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or

re-transmit this email.  If you have received this email in error,

please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone

(call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any

attachments.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance.

In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of

this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, 

any

contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the

foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any

digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is

included in any attachment to this email.

_______________________________________________

CentOS mailing list

CentOS@centos.org

http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

From:	Curt Mills <hacker@fluke.com>
To:	CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org>
Date:	11/02/2009 01:11 PM
Subject:	Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines
Sent by:	centos-bounces@centos.org