centos-bounces@centos.org schrieb am 28.01.2014 14:56:53:
Von: Sorin Srbu Sorin.Srbu@orgfarm.uu.se An: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Datum: 28.01.2014 14:57 Betreff: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? Gesendet von: centos-bounces@centos.org
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Logan McNaughton Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:33 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Where I work we use NIS + Kerberos (Active Directory). We have about
150
machines at our site. It works quite well, as someone said, the big
draw
back to NIS is that it sends passwords insecurely, but if you use
Kerberos
for authentication it's really quite easy to manage.
We do have Active Directory as well, but only for the Windows clients.
But I'd rather keep them separated.
Kerberos on linux. Is that a pain or a bigger pain? Whenever I've worked with Kerberos on Windows I've come out all sweaty afterwards... 8-S
-- //Sorin _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi Sorin, we're using ldap with kerberos connected to Active Directoy on our squid proxy with success. And a few Linux-Admins are working (with their Windows User name and Password) with Kerberos connected to Active Directoy on their workstations.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Andreas Reschke