Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one
of
Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user feedback and involvement without user feedback and involvement.
So, you're saying that end users need to go poke their noses into the development process, but that developers don't need to poke their noses out to the end users... or at least, that's how I read what you're saying.
If you want to go out of your way to read it that way, it's hard to stop you. However, it's not what I'm saying. The development process is conducted in the open for a reason.
I don't see that as going "out of my way". Let's put it this way: how many times have folks on the development side poked their nose in here - the general redhat list is pretty dead - and asked anything? I've been here since '09, and I *think* that maybe once, *maybe* twice, someone asked something here, who was on that side of the house.
Perhaps, if it's open, it should be a two way street, not one way, for us to take time from what we're being paid for, to hit that side.
Oh, and btw, we *do* have a few RH licenses... and for those who have to deal with smart card ID cards, you can thank my manager for pushing through native support in RHEL 7. So I guess you could say we do, sometimes, go to the development side.
mark