Hi,
"Nicolas Kovacs" info@microlinux.fr wrote:
https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at...
The article states that CentOS will now be "upstream" of RHEL instead of "downstream".
This is strange to me. I never thought CentOS was upstream or downstream of RHEL; I always thought it *was* RHEL -- perhaps a little delayed, but that's not the same as being "downstream".
But that's also part of the problem for Red Hat, at least that's my impression and I can understand why.
It's also clear that Red Hat didn't understand the importance of the 10-year support period.
I _could_ probably live with CentOS Stream for the benefit of all even if it's not 100% identical to RHEL but as stable as it, _but_, only if they extend the maintenance period to the same 10 years analog to RHEL.
@Red Hat, do you hear our voices?
Regards, Simon