3 Jun
2009
3 Jun
'09
2:37 p.m.
On 06/03/2009 01:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice than CentOS 5.3
Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)
I dont think that will be a problem, since we have never been in sync with Red Hat's naming scheme.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq