1 Oct
2014
1 Oct
'14
4:36 p.m.
On 10/01/2014 06:20 PM, Darr247 wrote:
On 2014-10-01 12:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Somebody, correct me...
It also provides some measure of assurance that tampering of the content has not occurred between time of sending and time of decryption, though just *signing* it with the private key (without also encrypting) should accomplish that as well.
it's two different processes and they use different keys: you sign a message using your private key, but you encrypt a message using the recipient's public key.