On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 12:06, Simon Perreault wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I don't see any way to reconcile this statement with a restriction that any particular copy of it may only be installed on one computer, even if that restriction comes from a separate contract that provides your service agreement.
Isn't it acceptable for Red Hat to sell SLAs on a per-computer basis?
Of course. What does an SLA have to do with restricting copying or redistribution?
I really don't get where you're going.
What kind of restriction would be excluded by the GPL if not ones that restrict copying, installing on additional machines, or redistribution?