just seeing how you are turning out updates as quickly as RHEL releases them, is exactly what I am looking for.
I wanted to remain with the stability of a RHEL disto while avoiding the licensing fees and the Fedora upgrade treadmill.
not sure, about this stability stuff. Red hat updated samba from 3.0.2 to 3.0.4, and now samba+cups prints ok, but printed jobs remain visible and pending in the windows queue?!?!?! This could have never happened in debian stable.
Not to knock the decent effort of
other RHEL clones, this clearly is not an one man show like Whitebox or Tao, nor lacks the community involvement of Fedora Legacy. This was something I was clearly looking to avoid.
Also I found in checking security fix dates compared to RHEL mailings that Centos beats out Whitebox which still has not released the group of fixes from 9/1.
the only thing that wbel has over centos is their mailing list, which by the way is used by centos users too(at least I do)
...oh ... and also they made a wbel respin2. I think centos is still on respin1.