Op 25-04-13 16:33, m.roth@5-cent.us schreef:
Johan Vermeulen wrote:
Op 25-04-13 14:49, Daniel J Walsh schreef:
On 04/25/2013 04:54 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
Op 24-04-13 22:53, m.roth@5-cent.us schreef:
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Disabling SELinux is not going to fix your problem. Since the field > is just showing you that you have extended attibutes assigned to yr > files.
<snip> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> thanks again for the reactions. >>> >>> This is the NetworkManager script I'm trying to use: <snip> >>> as far as I can test this at the moment, it works without Selinux and >>> doesn't work with Selinux enabled. >>> >>> I also want Selinux enabled. So I will do some searching on how to make >>> it work with Selinux. > Dear All, > > thanks for the advise. > > Yes, it concerns a laptop, if not I would indeed turn of NetworkManager. Ah! And selinux. Have you encrypted the h/d's?
you know, I did argue that with my boss but he was against it. Guess he didn't want to type 2 passwords. So the only encrypted laptop is my own. But my boss was sorry when his got stolen a few months ago.
I am in the process of converting our last older OpenSuse-laptop to CentOs6.4. Now all 26 of our Linux laptops ( 4 sadly run Windows ) will be on CentOs.
I often hear people say they would never run CentOs on laptops, but I think it works great.
Also today I will replace the last of 4 machines of our admin Department to CentOs. ( One will remain on Windows ) .
I just needed to share that with somebody.
I think we all understand that one, and I think a round of applause is due
congratulations.
mark
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
thank you thank you