17 Jan
2009
17 Jan
'09
3:06 a.m.
R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, nate wrote:
I would not use CentOS at all if for anything else than Oracle won't support it. Oracle linux is a clone of RHEL and I believe is pretty cheap, otherwise RHEL 5 Advanced.
ummm .. a recent UBL was a rebuild of CentOS SRPMs
Doesn't matter if even the RPMS are exactly the same, at least to me. Use something the vendor will support for a product that costs as much as Oracle does, especially if the additional costs are minimal.
Unless Oracle supports CentOS these days, it's been about a year since I used Oracle.
Did a bunch of searches and couldn't find the list of supported linux versions and patch levels.
nate