On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:32 PM, fred smith fredex@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
two things:
- there's already a program named test, which displays no output,
it merely has an exit status.
And, in general, it is a poor idea showing little imagination to name a test program "test."
- for a program in your current directory, run it with a preceding "./",
e.g., "./test"--because "." is not in the path (and shouldn't be).
I rather like having . in my path, and up front. However, programs should reflect something of their content. The Hello World program could much more recognizably (and future-referentially) named "hello."
It's one of those mornings....
mhr