IMHO the convention is stupid (and isn't really any convention - everyone does it differently, i've seen x.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa being CNAMEs to: x.128.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa, x.128/25.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa x.128-255.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa, x.128-25.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa or even x.x.x.x.revdns.company.com or x.revdns.company.com) and the only reason it's even there is because Bind is brain-dead. There's no need to use anything besides normal x.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa (especially if you use djbdns or if you're willing to put a little more work into bind).
Cheers, MaZe.
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Simone wrote:
Hi list, I first apologise because this is really off topic, but I would really appreciate your opinion on this.
I have had a very hard time configuring a DNS server to answer reverse dns queries, and I would like to have your opinion on my provider behaviour. We have 3 classless subnets and asked the provider to delegate reverse dns. They configured their server and emailed me all was fine but i it didn't work for one subnet, so I mailed back and they assure their side was all perfectly configured. I finally find out (spending lot of time and thanks to www.dnsstuff.com) that they configured 2 zones like 128/27.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa and one as 128-27.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa, so my server was not able to answer queries because I had all zones 128/27.x.x.x.in-addr.arpa. As said before it is my first time configuring Bind and I am sure the more experienced would have notice and solved it quite soon, but still I wonder why to use different convention (without telling us) and even if this is correct (red the http://rfc.net/rfc2317.html and they always use "/" not "-" ). Hope I won't be banned from the list for this email......
Thanks for your time reading this
Simone _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos