On 01/11/2012 07:33 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
wwp wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:31:43 +0100 Ljubomir Ljubojevicoffice@plnet.rs
wrote:
On 01/11/2012 08:45 AM, wwp wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 (PST) John Doejdmls@yahoo.com
wrote:
From: wwpsubscript@free.fr
I wonder if some mount options aren't wrong with USB pendrives, see: /dev/sdd1 on /media/monolith type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,flush)
my suspicion is about the flush option, which I find atypical here.
<snip> > ehci_hcd does manage my devices (it's not a loadable module, apparently compiled in kernel instead), see for instance: > > kernel: usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 28 <snip> This may be a dumb question, but have you done an lsusb? I'd be curious - I know that on my brand new, as of a few months ago, Dell I have two kinds of USB ports, 1.1 and 2.0. We also have some 1.1 webcams... and some 1.0.
See if your pen drive's in a slower port.
Yes I have seen those too and was VERY surprised.