3 Aug
2010
3 Aug
'10
10:04 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.admin@gmail.com wrote:
One of the problem with Lustre's style of distributed storage which Gluster points out is that the bottleneck is the meta server which tells clients where to find the actual data. Gluster supposedly scales with every client machine added because it doesn't use a meta server, file locations are determined using some kind of computed hash.
But who uses gluster in a production environment then? I have seen less posts (both on forums and mailing lists) about Glusteter, than lustre.
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532