On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 08:48 -0700, MJang wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:36 -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-bounces@centos.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:23 -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-bounces@centos.org wrote:
On 7.4.2011 16:58, Les Mikesell wrote:
This sounds as if RH is responsible for not yet released CentOS 6 ? What did I miss ? What changes do you talking about ?
AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches. Starting 6.0 RH releases patched source. This makes backing out a patch, or backporting patches from future development in Fedora (e.g.) far more nightmarish than before.
Also AIUI, it appears the (undisclosed) RH build environment changed significantly, such that generating bit-for-bit identical binaries (a CentOS objective) requires mind-reading RH folks by CentOS folks (aka reverse-engineering the undisclosed RH build environment).
These two square wheels make the CentOS wagon a bit slower than before.
I would appreciate an answer to one related question.
Will CentOS release CentOS 6.0 as a production release?
I see three possible answers: yes/no/TBD.
Answer 4: This is not just an answer of "yes it's a production release" it's "production releases are all that CentOS ever does."
Appreciate the clarification. I had thought that like SL, there would have been a CentOS 6 beta. From my searches, it appears that I was mistaken, there is no --public-- (or private?) CentOS 6 beta.
If I'm reading https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=25878&forum=... correctly, there will be a CentOS 6 beta first,
though http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/6/AuditStatus suggests about 50 packages still at issue in the audit process.
So those audited packages must be cleared first before a CentOS 6 beta is released?
Thanks, Mike