On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 10:25 +0100, Sébastien AVELINE wrote:

<SNIP>

  

And, to follow up my own post, I've just had a quick look through my
LVS list mails and spotted:

http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2006-11/msg00200.html 


There's no follow up from the OP which may or may not be a good thing. :)

It appears a kernel upgrade to 2.6.18 (!) may help. You might want to
fire off a mail to the OP and ask if he had any success. I have the
un-obfuscated address in my mailstore, I'll send it offlist.

Will.
      

Thanks for your help, but I will wait for an official patch from centos, 
I hope that I will be heard.

Sebastien
    

Please follow the above thread and let me know if / when they find the
problem.

We will not be upgrading "officially" the ipvs RPM above the one that is
in the RHCS / RHGFS RPMS ... but we can put something in the testing
repo if ipvs turns out to be the issue.

We can also feedback via the RHEL bugzilla to get any patches
incorporated (as required) to the ipvs RPM upstream.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes 

  

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos