Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have never liked the SSLvpn architecture. Never really liked the SSL handshake; just too chatty. I wear my biases quite plainly on my arm sleeve (I chaired the IPsec workgroup during the time the RFCs came out). You want security, go with IPsec. Even ESP NULL gives you per packet authentication and thus proof of server and client. Just pay the price for IKE, which I never liked. Part of the reason I invented HIP....
But ssl vpns work though just about any firewall/proxy/nat that already permit https. Traversing those can be painful or impossible for ipsec.